Victor Hugo
The Second SexVictor Hugo is presented through his relationship with Juliette Drouet, whose devotion to the poet becomes a case study in the costs of making a lover the center of one’s existence. His influence over her combines practical dependence with emotional absence: he limits her freedom, yet she continues to organize her days, labor, and sense of purpose around him. The account uses their relationship to examine how loving service can offer a feeling of being needed while leaving the devoted person with little life beyond waiting.
Identity and Relationship
Hugo enters the account not through a broad biographical portrait but as Drouet’s celebrated lover and the person around whom her daily life is arranged. She seeks to be useful to him, making a home, preparing special dishes, caring for his clothes, and assisting with his papers. Her attachment makes his needs a measure of her own importance: the more he asks of her, the more necessary she feels.
That service extends to intellectual and clerical work. Drouet reads newspapers for Hugo, cuts out articles, organizes letters and notes, and copies manuscripts. When he gives some of this work to his daughter Léopoldine, Drouet is upset. The episode makes visible how thoroughly the role of indispensable helper has become bound up with her place in Hugo’s life; even an ordinary redistribution of tasks threatens the identity she has built around serving him.
Control and Domestic Service
The relationship also has a coercive dimension. After Hugo had her break with her wealthy protector, Prince Demidoff, he confined her to a small apartment and forbade her to go out alone for twelve years, intending to keep her from her former friends. Drouet called herself his cloistered victim. The restriction isolated her from independent social life while leaving her devotion to Hugo intact.
Within that constrained domestic world, care becomes a means of affirming closeness. Drouet tends Hugo’s clothing and wants the work of mending and cleaning to remain hers alone. Her aspiration to serve is not simply a list of household duties: she treats service as evidence that she belongs in his life. Yet the arrangement makes her contribution visible chiefly as support for the poet, while her own independence and ambitions recede.
Hugo’s presence does not resolve the dependence produced by this arrangement. Even after Drouet’s circumstances improved, she continued to see him little and to regard him as the center of her existence. Her correspondence records both her attachment and the distance between them: the relationship could dominate her life without supplying the steady companionship she wanted.
Waiting, Correspondence, and Unfulfilled Independence
Waiting becomes the defining rhythm of Drouet’s life with Hugo. She repeatedly describes returning to the same condition of waiting, and compares herself to a squirrel in a cage. She writes that the day seems endless when she does not see him, and that she would rather wait than believe he will not come. Such expressions are presented as evidence of a life structured around anticipated visits rather than independent activity.
The scale of her correspondence gives that pattern a concrete form: Drouet wrote Hugo seventeen thousand letters, at a rate of three to four hundred a year. Despite her efforts to help him, the hours between visits remained empty. She had hoped to reconcile independence with love, imagining a life in which she could depend on a state for her livelihood while remaining devoted to Hugo by choice. But her acting career had failed, and she resigned herself to being his lover for the rest of her life. The contrast is central: she could imagine independence, but her circumstances and attachment left her with few means to realize it.
Jealousy and the Limits of Devotion
Drouet’s dependence also shapes her relations with other women. She suspects women who come near Hugo, though she fails to fear Léonie Biard, who was his mistress for eight years. In the book’s account, jealousy narrows the devoted woman’s world further: friendship becomes difficult when other women appear primarily as rivals for the beloved’s attention. Suspicion intensifies the isolation on which dependence already rests.
The analysis distinguishes Drouet’s devotion from a simple account of self-punishment. Her willingness to serve Hugo and her acts of adoration do not, by themselves, establish masochism; the distinction offered is that freely given and accepted devotion need not be a desire for suffering. Yet the account warns that generous self-giving can slide toward self-directed rage when the beloved’s demands and the woman’s dependence become entangled. Drouet’s story therefore holds devotion and constraint together without treating them as identical.
Narrative and Thematic Significance
Hugo’s role in the narrative is defined by the asymmetry between his importance to Drouet and the limited access she has to him. He is the person for whom she cooks, keeps house, manages papers, and waits; he is also the person whose restrictions contribute to her isolation and whose intermittent presence does not fill her days. Her usefulness offers a sense of purpose, but it does not produce an independent life or a secure, reciprocal companionship.
Through this relationship, Simone de Beauvoir develops a broader argument about women who make love their sole vocation. Drouet’s devotion gives her a way to feel necessary, yet it subordinates her future and activity to the man treated as the essential figure. The seventeen thousand letters, the years of restricted movement, the relinquished acting career, and the long intervals between visits make the cost of that arrangement concrete. Hugo is thus significant less as a portrait in his own right than as the central figure in an example of love organized around service, dependence, and waiting.